Man with a plan

April 24th, 2007

“It’s a box!” the grumpy tutor exclaimed. Ned felt dejected as it was not the first time this had happened since he had decided it would be a good idea to study architecture. Ned constantly thought to himself, “if only i didn’t leave planning”.

As it turns out, there is very little to stop me from going back to Urban and Regional Planning. After talking to an old lecturer last week, I found out just how easy it is for me to change back again. When I first floated the idea of chucking in the towel with architecture and going back to planning, I thought that everyone would be saying “Oh Ned, why can’t you just make up your mind’. As it turns out, no one is really surprised as I never convinced them of the merits of studding architecture in the first place.
Other peoples support is great, but the only person I need to convince is myself. Hence, I have come up with a list of compelling reasons for me to go back to planning:

  • While I like the design process and methodology in theory, in practice, it is replacing PHP or Perl with concrete and steel
  • For whatever reason I am better at expressing my thoughts in written form, rather than visually
  • Architecture is a very narrow field. You pretty much have to live and breath buildings, which I don’t
  • A cardboard box, in my view, has a kind of aesthetic that is greater than those of most of the “cutting edge” architecture
  • I have broad interests. Politics, the environment, social issues, economics. Very few fields could allow me to cover such breadth, planning just happens to be one of them.
  • To a certain extent, I already live and breath planning. I spend much of my spare time keeping up today with the issues (sad I know). Why not get paid for it?

So there you go, I have actually articulated what I want to do with my life. Now it is just a waiting game for QUT to process my admission into a Bachelor of Urban Development. Could they have picked a name for a degree with more negative connotations? Thankfully there isn’t much in a name.

Surely he hasn’t thought this one through

April 16th, 2007

Warming to reality

April 8th, 2007

Phony Philanthropy

March 22nd, 2007

Green motoring

March 19th, 2007

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.